Monday, February 9, 2015

The Seventh New Hampshire Volunteers: A Month in New York City, January - February 1862.

The Seventh New Hampshire Volunteers:
A Month in the big city: Street life, Drilling in Washington Square, Keeping Horace Greeley out in the cold, and the dinner for the Sons of New Hampshire. New York City, January - February 1862.






Paul Whipple and the Seventh arrived in New York on January 15, 1862 to await deployment to "the seat of war" in the South.  While in New York, the soldiers had the experience of being at sea for the first time during their trip.  They

"at once went on board the sound boat "Connecticut," with orders to proceed to Jersey City, N. J. 
On Long Island Sound everything went smoothly until about 2 o'clock a. m. of the 15th [of January], when the weather became squally, and the boat pitched badly. Many of the men who had never before experienced a trip by water, soon found out how people felt when under the influence of sea-sickness. All around the bulwarks appeared a measly looking crowd, and every mother's son of them seemed to have a lot to say about New York, but our destination was then Jersey City." Little, Henry F. W. 1896.  The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire Volunteers in the War of the Rebellion. Concord, N. H., I. C. Evans, Printer. p.23
Upon arriving in Jersey City, they received orders to head instead for New York City:
"we steamed up to Jersey City and laid by there a number of hours, the cause for this soon after became apparent. A telegram from Washington, D. C, awaited us, ordering the regiment into barracks in the City of New York. Consequently we crossed over to the South Hampton and Havre pier, at the foot of Canal street, where we disembarked, and were marched up Canal street to Broadway, down Broadway, and to 79 White street, near the corner of Broadway, where there was a building formerly used for storage purposes, six stories in height, including basement, which had been leased by the government as a depot for troops awaiting orders. Our regiment was at once marched inside and occupied the upper floors, the officers occupying a part of the first or ground floor, reserving the other portion for guard mounting: and every day when the weather would permit, we were drilled on Washington Square, in company or battalion drill." Little, The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire, p.23-24.
              Washington Square Park, April 20, 1861.Washington's statue holds flag from Fort Sumter.             http://www.forgottendelights.com/omomapp/omomreal/washusq.html

Provisions are easy to come by at first. 
"as soon as the boy's found they could not get out without a pass, they began to barter with outsiders from the windows, and we often noticed suspicious looking bottles going up to one of the upper floors, suspended from a line. From other windows they were hauling in small baskets or boxes loaded with pies, cakes, fruit, or clothing, the price of the articles having been previously thrown to the venders on the ground. It was soon evident that considerable " black-strap," as the men called it, was gaining admittance, and the more effectually to stop it, an order was issued to station guards or sentinels at each window, which almost wholly ended our traffic with the outside world." Little, The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire, p.24.

A vendor was allowed to set up shop instead, but soon began to charge higher prices than the traders outside.  The soldiers attacked his shop and would have looted it clean had not the officer of the guard stepped in to prevent it.  The soldiers also at first endured shorten the rations and poor quality food from the local vendors.  In protest, the soldiers would:  

"file along to their places, face the table, take their plates of bean soup, turn them upside down, and file quietly back to their quarters. Then the order of things was slightly changed, and we got mutton soup, which must have been made from the very poorest and strongest kind of mutton, to judge by the smell of the article, to which, under the circumstances,
the men did not take kindly. Consequently, when they got down at the tables and could sniff the peculiar flavor from the cook-room, they knew what was coming, and at once set up such a continuous bleating that one would think a large western sheep ranch had arrived, and at a given signal, over would go the plates, soup and all. but after a time the quality of the rations was in a measure remedied by the officer' of the day paying more attention to his duties, being present at each meal, to see if the rations were fairly issued and of good quality, and that a plentiful supply was set before the men." Little, The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire, p.24-25.
 In the midst of this, the local Sons of New Hampshire, including Horace Greeley, proposed to throw a party in honor of the Seventh, but the soldiers were again disappointed to find that only the officers had been invited, as reported in the New York Times:
RECEPTION DINNER TO THE SEVENTH NEW HAMPSHIRE REGIMENT.
Yesterday morning the Sons of New-Hampshire met at the Grand Hotel, in order to make arrangements to give the officers of the Seventh New-Hampshire Regiment, now in this City, a proper reception before they leave for the seat of war. Messrs. H. B. Perkins.W. N. Brown, N. P. Higgins, E. P. Budd, George F. Peterson, C. A. Soule and Joseph Cushing were appointed a committee to, wait upon the officers of the Seventh, and tender them the hospitalities of The Sons of New-Hampshire. The Invitation was accepted, and the dinner will take place to-morrow evening, at six o'clock. All New-Hampshire men resident in this City are expected to attend.  New York Times. January 18, 1862, col.3, p.5)

 
The Committee, along with Horace Greeley, ventured down to the barracks to collect the officers, but did not quite get the reception they expected:

“A few days after the regiment arrived in New York, the Sons of New Hampshire living in the city, gave the officers of our regiment a supper. The men in the ranks did not like it because all were not invited. On the evening of the banquet George W. Fisher, of Company I, was one of the guards at the officers' quarters, and the Sons of New Hampshire were to come and escort the officers over to the banquet rooms. The orders to the sentinels were not to pass anyone unless accompanied by an officer. Fisher told his comrade, who was on guard with him, that he did not know the Sons of New Hampshire from a side of sole-leather, and that he did not propose to let anyone in with-out an officer for escort. Among others that appeared and wanted to go in was a man with a gray coat, who was kept waiting with the others. After a while, Adjutant Henderson came out and told the guards that they had kept Horace Greeley out in the cold tor fifteen or twenty minutes, to which they replied that they were obeying orders. A sergeant was then detailed to pass in the visitors.” Little, The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire, p.26.
79 White Street as it looks today. Present building dates from 1915.
While the officers were treated to their dinner, Little remarks that for the soldiers:
"Occasionally some patriotic citizen would come up to headquarters and ask permission to go in and take out a few of the men to a theatre or lecture, and many life-long acquaintances were thus made by our New Hampshire boy's with citizens of the great metropolis. The men who were thus favored passed many pleasant hours with their whilom chaperon." Little, The Seventh Regiment New Hampshire, p.26-27.
http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-lost-metropolitan-hotel-no-578.html

The New York Times did do a fairly extensive write-up of the Sons of New Hampshire dinner, which was from this account a lively affair at the posh Metropolitan Hotel.  However, even in this account one can hear the distant horrors of the war that were already known, and the horrors to come.

WELCOME TO THE SEVENTH NEW-HAMPSHIRE
*
Dinner at the Metropolitan Hotel—A
Cordial Greeting
*
Speeches by Lieut-Col. Abbott, Mr. Soule, Mr. H. B. Perkins, Horace Greeley, Gen. Hall, Judge Peabody, and others.

The sons of New-Hampshire, resident in New York, extended a cordial welcome to the Seventh New-Hampshire Regiment yesterday, as the latter passed through the City, en route for the seat of war. In the evening a dinner was given to the officers at the Metropolitan Hotel. The repast was expressly designed to meet the sharp appetites of soldiers, and abounded not only in substantials, but in some of the delicacies which the Messrs Leland know so well how to prepare. The arrangements were excellently made by the Committee, Messrs. N. Higgins, E. P. Budd, H. B. Perkins, W.N. Brown, George F. Patterson, C.A. Soule, and Joseph Cushing.
At about 7 1/2 the guests, to the number of one hundred and fifty, sat down and did full justice to the excellence of the viands presented for their consideration. At the head of the table was a vacant seat for Col. Putnam. On either side were arranged the Chairman, Mr. Soule, Lieut.-Col. Abbot, Gen. Hall, Horace Greeley, Judge Peabody, Judge Bonny, Maj. Roland, of the Berdan Sharpshooters, and others.
At the conclusion of the gustatory performance, the Chairman, M. Soule, called the assemblage to order and proceeded to address them briefly. He said they were a family party. They knew the cause was just, and the right must prevail. [Applause.] When, after the memorable events of the 19th of April, New-York saw a regiment of Massachusetts volunteers [Applause.] marching to the relief of the Capital and the defense of the Union, they believed that the ‛hidden curse’ on the assailants of the Union was being fulfilled. [Applause.] they well remember the appearance of the First New Hampshire Regiment as it came fully prepared to take their position in the armies of the Union. [Applause.] Today, they welcome the Seventh Regiment. [Applause.] They all knew that the name of Putnam, in the present as well as in the past, was a synonym of patriotism and greatness. They all remembered the part the the Second New Hampshire Regiment had taken in the battle of Bull Run, and that made the soil of Virginia sacred to them. They all remembered how Israel Putnam had sought out, and dragged her den the wolf that had been depredating upon his own and his neighbors’ property; and he hoped that the Putnam who commanded this regiment would follow the wolf of rebellion to her den, and drag her forth. [Applause.] In conclusion, he gave the health of Col. Putnam of the Seventh New Hampshire Volunteers.
Col. Putnam being absent, owing to pressing official duties, Lieut.-Col. Abbott responded. He believed that the return, rather than the advance, would prove the proper occasion for ovations like this. He hoped they would deserve such a reception on their return. [Applause.] He took occasion to show what New Hampshire has done in this war. The First Regiment had left on the 21st of May, the Seventh was on the way, and the Eighth and Ninth were under way. She had also furnished a regiment of artillery, a battalion of cavalry, and a regiment of sharpshooters. [Applause.] New-Hampshire had taken her part at Bunker Hill, and now 10,000 men in the field of this war. [Applause.] New-Hampshire had taken part in establishing this Government, and she meant to take some part in its preservation. [Applause.] They consider this war much holier than the Crusades. [Applause.] In such a war, the pomp of marching legions was eclipsed by the grandeur of their object. In conclusion, he gave,
“The Sons of New-Hampshire resident in New York – Their prominence in all walks of life in the City of their adoption is only equaled by their attachment to the State of their birth, and liberality to their citizens.” [Applause.]
The Lieutenant-Colonel call for three cheers for the sons of New-Hampshire, which were given with a will and reciprocated likewise.
The Chairman reiterated that they were here as a family party, and no one could complain that they praised their noble mother, New-Hampshire. In conclusion he proposed –
“The health of the President of the United States.”
and called upon Hon. Horace Greeley to respond.
Mr. Greeley spoke of the many officers of the army who had gone over to the rebels. The Preseident had a great many difficulties to contend against; a great many trials through which he was obliged to pass. Much opposition was in Washington of a very malignant type. An Army of the people had now been congregated. [Applause.] He believed, if the weather and roads were favourable, this body of men could crush out the rebellion in sixty days. He considered that the last danger was foreign interference. All oligarchs wished the overthrow of this Republic. He honored the old Tories of England who came out broadly against this country, for he knew that they had in mind the former victories of our arms. If the men who stand in the ranks of the South were to hear them, two-thirds of their number would walk over to our side. Only by wholesale lying can the rebellion be kept upon its legs for a month. The South need [ ] means more than they need men. They are called upon to buy muskets and war material, but have not the money to pay for them. He was positive that a majority of the citizens of the South, if they could be allowed the privilege of voting, would vote in favor of crushing the rebellion. He beseeched the soldiers New-Hampshire to carry upon their arms the hopes and the destinies of the human race. [Applause.]
The Chairman then read the next regular toast:
“New-Hampshire, our common mother,
Where’re we travel, whatso’er land we see,
Our hearts untrammeled, fondly belong to thee.
The Honor which her sons bestow upon her, is coeval with her granite hills.”
Mr. H.B. Perkins responded eloquently.
The Chairman next offered a sentiment, complementary to New-York and her citizen soldiery, and called upon Gen. Hall to respond.
Gen. Hall responded briefly and modestly, and gave as a sentiment,
“The ‛Star-Spangled Banner’ – Whether it is spread to the breeze in the North, South, East, or West, may every star in its field shine with is accustomed brilliancy.” [Applause.]
The Chairman called for “the Star Spangled Banner,” but no one seemed willing to start it.
A gentleman suggested that Mr. Tenney could sing it. Mr. Tenney said he would if he could, but he didn’t know the tune. He sang, however, with much effect, “Hurrah for Old New England.”
The Chairman next remarked that some of the lawyers of New-Hampshire had honored the bar of New-York. He gave as a sentiment –
The Bench of New-York – The Sons of New-Hampshire have sat upon it, and left it ermine unsullied.
Judge Peabody responded briefly, returning his acknowledgments for the honor paid himself and his Sate. His speech was received with much favor. In conclusion, Judge Peabody gave the following:
The War for the Union – A war not for or against any one institution, except that it is for the institution of civil liberty, but a war for the country and the Union, and whatever measures tend best to the preservation of the country and the protection of the Union are the best measures for conducting the war. [Applause.]
The Chairman next gave the following:
Reverence for and obedience to, the Law, the salvation of any country.
Judge Bonnett was called upon, and briefly responded in illustration of, and admiration for, the sentiment.
The Chairman next gave:
The Adopted Sons of New-Hampshire – She treats her sons as a mother treats her children.
Mr. Charles A. Luce, Esq., responded. He said that although the remark of Mr. Webster that New-Hampshire was a good place to emigrate from, had been interpreted as a slur upon New-Hampshire, Mr. Webster really intended it as a compliment. Mr. Webster has stated that he meant to say, that it was a good state to emigrate from, that when a man was known to hail from New-Hampshire, he was looked upon as a good fellow, and fared well accordingly. [Applause and laughter.] He complimented the energy of Lt.-Col. Abbott in raising the First New Hampshire Regiment, and bid God speed to the Seventh, on its way to the seat of war. He quoted the eloquent apotheosis of Gen. Baker to the American flag, and in conclusion gave the following sentiment:
The Seventh Regiment of New-Hampshire Volunteers, officered by regulars and volunteers – May they be each worthy of the other, and the whole combined be worthy of the Old Granite State, and the nation at large.
The Chairman next read the following volunteer toast:
Harvard University – The cradle in which the sons of New-Hampshire have learned to love their country.
Adjutant Henderson replied, trusting that he should never return until the rebellion is crushed.
Mr. Bryant, of Haverhill, said that he believed that New-Hampshire was a good State to emigrate to, and also to emigrate from. He found that the very heart and soul of New Hampshire was here. [Applause.] He was glad that though the soldiers of New-Hampshire were not to be commanded by a Stark they were to be commanded by a Putnam.
The Chairman next gave,
Our Parents, Brothers, and Sisters – If dead, we reverence them and remember them; if alive, we pray for their long life and continued prosperity.
The Chairman next gave the health of the man who saved the Great Eastern in her time of peril during the last voyage. He gave the health of Hamilton E. Towle.
Mr. Towle declined to speak, but was honored with three cheers.
The Chairman next read a volunteer toast.
The Smith Family – First in peace, first in war, and first in the hearts of their countrymen.
Maj. Smith was called upon to speak, but declined, saying he was too old to commence that business.
Mr. Lege gave the following:
The Seventh New-Hampshire Regiment – When we hear from them may they be chasing the reels and never be chased.
He called upon Capt. Chase to respond.
Capt. Chase replied in eloquent strains. The next sentiment was –
Pittsfield – We feel sad to leave it for war.
Capt. Leavitt was called upon to respond, but was excused because he was on duty. [Applause.]
Major Roland was next called upon, and sang, amid much applause, the Grave of Napoleon.
Major Roland proposed the health of Gov. Berry of New-Hampshire, which was received with cheers.
Mr. Perkins proposed the health of their worthy landlord, Simon[?] Leland, who could both make a speech and keep a hotel.
Mr. Leland was called for and cheered, but modestly declined.
The Chairman proposed the health of the Lieutenant-Colonel of the Fifty-second New-York Volunteers.
Lieut-Col. Kasinski responded, hoping that in less than one year the thirty-four stars would be united. [Applause.]
The Chairman next called upon Mr. John Raymond to respond to a toast complimentary to the legal talent of New-Hampshire.
Mr. Raymond responded felicitously.
Major Roland proposed the health of the Commander-in-Chief of the Army of the United States. He said that Gen. Todtleben had remarked to him, on receiving a copy of one of Gen. McClellan’s works, that we had two great Generals here, Scott and McClellan, and Gen. Todtleben predicted the future success of Gen. McClellan [Cheers]
The Chairman next gave
New Hampshire – Famous for granite, ice, and men, and celebrated for good Breeding.
Mr. Breed responded in a humorous address.
The chairman next made a toast complementary to the Press, which was received with cheers. He next gave “The Clergy,” to which
Mr. Chaplin Emerson, of the New Hampshire Seventh, responded.
Other speeches and toasts followed, and it was not until a late hour that the convivial assemblage separated.
The New York Times.  January 19, 1862, col2, p.8.  (Names in bold were given in capital letters in original.  The New York Times spelled state names such as New Hampshire" or New York" with a hyphen.)
Battle flags of the 7th New Hampshire. National Archives.




Friday, December 5, 2014

The Rise of Baptist Republicanism By Oran P. Smith (1998 book review)


Review: Oran P. Smith, The Rise of Baptist Republicanism.
New York University Press, N.Y., 1997
Intro., append., biblio., ill., tab., fig., 320 pages. $38.50 cloth.
Published in The Southeastern Political Review
[now Politics & Policy]
Volume 26, Issue 3 (Fall), 1998.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1998.tb00518.x/abstract
PDF: https://www.academia.edu/298476/Review_The_Rise_of_Baptist_Republicanism_by_Oran_P._Smith_1998_


A fellow sociologist told me that he was convinced that within the chest of every political scientist beats the heart of a pollster. Oren P. Smith’s work show that this was clearly merely the usual disciplinary rivalry. Smith has given both political scientists and sociologists a fascinating and well documented study of the transformation of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) into the single largest religious force in modern American politics. What is especially appealing about this work is that its eclecticism is its strength. It would be easy to present a one-sided account of the Southern Baptist Convention, and especially easy to reduce the SBC to being just another religious group and lump them into the so-called “New Right”. All too often in lesser or more journalistic studies, we find the latent prejudice of many non-southerners directed towards the peculiar historical traditions of the south. This is what Smith calls the problem of “Southerness”---which even he, as a native South Carolinian, has trouble defining. But this is not a detriment, because throughout this work one notices the depth of feeling the author has for his region and state, and this translates into his desire to tell this portion of its story in as much of its complexity as possible. It may well be true that only a southerner could have written with so much insight into Southern politics.

The strengths of the book are many and the argument is laid out in a convincing manner. Smith details how the historical changes in the SBC parallels the changes in the Republican party and in what ways the political challenges and disputes in each are similar. In terms of the its influence on regional politics, the SBC functions as a barometer of southern culture and politics, in part because it is a fairly open and democratic organization and in part because of its reflection and reproduction of “Southerness” and “Southern political culture”. Through it all, the SBC has become “the very symbol of the rising influence of the religious right”(27).

This brings up the question of how we are to understand such entities as the “New Christian Right,” or the “New Right”. The terms themselves denote ambiguous common sense notions that cover a messy amalgam of neo-conservatives, fundamentalist and evangelical Christians, military/industrial sectors, political action committees, think tanks, etc., whose grip on power results from one of those wonderfully abstract pendulum swings of American politics. It is clear that the difficulty in defining the New Right has raised the troubling possibility that there is no unitary politics of the Right, and therefore no single ideology emanating from a central source. Smith examines this problem of the definition of the New Right without sacrificing the real differences and conflicts between what he terms “Movement Right” ideologies. He makes a genuine contribution to the excavation of one of the multiple locations of conservative ideology. Perhaps most importantly, Smith’s study helps situate the New Right in the arena of everyday social conflicts; conflicts which have long histories and which are passionately fought. Consequently, Smith’s study renders the usual definitions of the New Right problematic, and contributes to the great need to understand the complexity of American conservatism. The “Movement Right” is neither the creation of a small group of leaders, nor a formless mass of half-wits, dupes, or religious fanatics.

The richness of Smith’s study in terms of everyday politics is found in his case study of the rise of Baptist Republicanism in South Carolina. The principle actors, Bob Jones University (Bob Jones Sr. and III), the Christian Coalition (Pat Robertson, Ralph Reed), the Moral Majority (Jerry Falwell), and the SBC, form the nodes around which the movement of fundamentalist and evangelical Southern Democrats into the Republican Party can be traced. “Each comes to politics with unique motivations, each has a religious and political history of its own, and each fundamentalist group responds to different stimuli”(99). Smith’s examination of the political realignment to the Republican Party and the dynamics of the interaction between the four branches of the “Movement Fundamentalist Right” in South Carolina is particularly insightful in showing us how the politics of a region, and the politics of a religion, came to dominate major portions of the national political agenda. Especially important in Smith’s discussion is the effect of the “culture wars” on the development of Baptist Republicanism.

If there are criticisms to be made, they are minor. It might honestly be said that sociologists are more skeptical of polling data than are political scientists. While Smith implicitly seeks to move beyond the traditional confines of his discipline, the results of public opinion polls are often reported uncritically. Another criticism is that one wishes Smith had told us a bit more about his own relation to his subject, for it certainly informs his work.

This book will be valuable to anyone interested in contemporary southern politics and religion. Political scientists, sociologists, and students of the relationship between religion and politics in contemporary America will also find important insights in this book. The appendix giving a chronological history of the Southern Baptist Convention’s move towards Baptist Republicanism is an excellent resource for researchers as well.

B. Ricardo Brown
Department of Social Science & Cultural Studies
Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, New York
BRBrownIII@earthlink.net

Saturday, November 22, 2014

Theodor Adorno on the time Charlie Chaplin imitated him "at a villa in Malibu"

"....surely I am one of the few intellectuals to whom this happened and to be able to account for it when it happened."

From
The Yale Journal of Criticism 9.1 (1996) 57-61
Chaplin Times Two
Theodor W. Adorno
Translated by John MacKay

"Perhaps I may justify my speaking about him by recounting a certain privilege which I was granted, entirely without having earned it. He once imitated me, and surely I am one of the few intellectuals to whom this happened and to be able to account for it when it happened. Together with many others we were invited to a villa in Malibu, on the coast outside of Los Angeles. While Chaplin stood next to me, one of the guests was taking his leave early. Unlike Chaplin, I extended my hand to him a bit absent-mindedly, and, almost instantly, started violently back. The man was one of the lead actors* from The Best Years of Our Lives, a film famous shortly after the war; he lost a hand during the war, and in its place bore practicable claws made of iron. When I shook his right hand and felt it return the pressure, I was extremely startled, but sensed immediately that I could not reveal my shock to the injured man at any price. In a split second I transformed my frightened expression into an obliging grimace that must have been far ghastlier. The actor had hardly moved away when Chaplin was already playing the scene back. All the laughter he brings about is so near to cruelty; solely in such proximity to cruelty does it find its  legitimation and its element of the salvational. Let my remembrance of this event and my thanks be my congratulations to him on his 75th birthday."
*The actor described here was Harold Russell (b.1914 in Nova Scotia), who in fact lost both his hands as a soldier during World War II. Acclaimed for his performance as one of the three returning veterans in William Wyler's The Best Years of Our Lives (1946), Russell became the only actor ever to win two Oscars for the same role: one for Best Supporting Actor, the other a special Oscar given "for bringing hope and courage to his fellow veterans." Russell made history again in 1992, as he became the first Oscar recipient to sell one of his awards, which he did in order to raise money to help cover his wife's medical expenses.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Hanns Eisler's Film Music with Screenplay & Story Written By John Steinbeck: The Forgotten Village (1941)

"A sociological study of the people, of a small pueblo in Santiago, in the remote mountains of Mexico, who have not caught up with modern civilization, as reflected in the life of a young boy, Juan Diego, and his family. A protest against the government and religion that keeps the peasants poor, uneducated and rooted to superstition and poverty."

 Opening caption:
"None of the people in this film are actors.  They are peasants, doctors, teachers, etc. in real life.  Most of the peasants have never seen a movie, but they understand our story well.  It was a part of their lives.
Among the tall mountains of Mexico the ancient life goes on sometimes little changing in a thousand years.  Now from the cities of the valley, new thinking and new techniques reach out to the remote villages.  The old and the new meet and sometimes clash, but from the meetings a gradual change is taking place in the villages.
This is a story of the little pueblo of Santiago in the mountains of Mexico.  And this is the story of the boy Juan Diego, and of his people who live in the long moment when the past slips reluctantly into the future.

Cast
Burgess Meredith ... Narrator (voice)

Directed By Herbert Kline, Alexander Hammid
Screenplay & Story Written By John Steinbeck
Associate Producer Rosa Harvan Kline
Producers Alexander Hammid, Herbert Kline
Cinematography By Alexander Hammid
Film Editing By Herbert Kline
Original Music By Hanns Eisler
Assistant Director Carlos L. Cabello

Release Date: November 18 1941 (USA)

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Syllabus for Cultural Studies (SS.330) Spring 2014, Pratt Institute

Cultural Studies  
SS 330.01 & .02
Department of Social Science & Cultural Studies
Pratt Institute Spring 2014

Meetings & Rooms:
Section I: Engineering 311 
Tuesday 2:00-4:50pm
Section II: Engineering 311 
Wednesday 2:00-4:50pm



B. Ricardo Brown, Ph.D.
Professor of Social Science and Cultural Studies
Office: Dekalb 419 Hours: 12:30-2pm Tues/Weds Phone: 1.718.636.3533
Email: BBROW993@Pratt.edu

SS-330 Cultural Studies
This course explores the relations of cultural artifacts in the contemporary world to their various social contexts. Culture is understood as the material expressions and images that people create and the social environment that shapes the way diverse groups of people experience their world and interact with one another. The course focuses on the critical analysis of these various forms of media, design, mass communications, arts, and popular culture.

Detailed Course Description & Objectives
The present era is often characterized as an age of global integration and a truly world economy as well as an era of social and environmental crises. In the midst of these changes we can often hear “culture” invoked as both a positive expression of this globalism and sometimes as something that opposes it. The full meaning of culture remains a topic of fierce debate and so “culture” is used as a political weapon, a claim of privilege, a rallying point for identity, a reservoir of resistance, or refers to various artifacts and practices that must be either preserved (good culture) or eliminated (degenerate culture).

Cultural Studies emerged from the attempts to understand these complex social and political uses of “culture” in such debates as those over “high & low” art, the value of the artifacts of popular culture (cinema, television, music, etc.), the deployments of knowledge and authority in the social relations of everyday life. We will examine how Cultural Studies offered a critical understanding of what Max Horkheimer termed “life as it is lived.” Attention will be paid to the fate of Cultural Studies as it became accepted and absorbed by various academic disciplines. In the final sessions, special attention will be given to the reception of Cultural Studies in the United States.

This course is designed to give you a foundation in Cultural Studies. It will show you how Cultural Studies emerged and its subsequent variations and lines of descent. You are not expected to already know this, nor are you expected to already be familiar with the texts we will use and issues that will be raised. You are expected to engage the course materials seriously. You will finish the course with an introduction to different ways of understanding the history of the present day and the social relations of everyday life.

OUTLINE OF THE COURSE OF STUDY

Session I: Introduction to the Course


Session II: Cultural Studies as a Cultural Artifact
On the Question “What is Cultural Studies?”
Simon During. 1999. “Introduction” to The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge.
 
Peruse and review:
Raymond Williams. 1983. “Culture” and “Society” from Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 87-93 and pp. 291-295.

Richard Johnson. 1987 (1996). “What is Cultural Studies Anyway?” in What is Cultural Studies? A Reader. Edited by John Storey. New York: Arnold, pp. 1-30. 

Comment Due By Sunday, 7am.
What, if anything, has changed about your answer to the question “What is Cultural Studies?” and what do you hope to learn from the study of a field like Cultural Studies?


Session III: Dialectic of Enlightenment I
Immanuel Kant. “What is Enlightenment?”

Peruse and review:
Raymond Williams. Civilization, 57-60; History, 146-148; Humanity, 148-151; Individual 161- 165; Western, 333-334. from Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society.

The Dialectic of Enlightenment I: Bach, Kant, Theresiana, Frederick, Sade, Horkheimer

Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. “Juliette or Enlightenment and Morality” from Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, pp. 81-119.

Debate between Michel Foucault and Noam Chomsky (1971)


Session IV:Dialectic of Enlightenment II: The Culture industry
Theodor Adorno. 1975. “Culture Industry Reconsidered.” New German Critique, 6, Fall, pp. 12-19.

In Our Time --- The Frankfurt School (BBC Radio4 podcast)

Peruse and review:
Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. Dialectic of Enlightenment, “The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception,” 129-167.


Session V: Fetishism and Popular Culture
Umberto Eco. “Casablanca” in Travels in Hyper-Reality pgs. 197-212.

Fetishism and Popular Culture


Comment II. Due Sunday 7am.
Keeping in mind that the Frankfurt School’s concept of a Culture Industry is not just a matter of corporate domination, but also the commodification of leisure (i.e., it is a commodity to be consumed) and the constant repetition of styles and fads, does the Culture Industry still exist?


Session VI: Cultural Studies and Understanding the Popular
Angela McRobbie. 1996 (1999). “The Place of Walter Benjamin in Cultural Studies” in Simon During, ed. The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 77-96.

Stuart Hall in During. “Encoding, decoding” in Simon During, ed. The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 507-517. 


Session VII: The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies and “The Birmingham School”
Michael Green. 1985 (1996). “The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies” in John Storey, ed. What is Cultural Studies? A Reader. New York: Arnold, pp. 49-60.

Peruse and review:
Stanley Aronowitz. “British Cultural Studies” in Roll Over Beethoven: the Return of Cultural Strife. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 109-130.

The Origins of Cultural Studies in the U.K.


Session VIII: The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies and “The Birmingham School”
Raymond Williams. 1989. [Three essays from] The Politics of Modernism. New York: Verso. [Required]
 
 “What is Modernism?” pp. 31-37.
 “Metropolitan Perceptions and the Emergence of Modernism” pp. 37- 48.
  “The Politics of the Avant-Garde” pp. 49-64.


Comment III. Due Sunday 7am.
Raymond Williams is very critical of the concept of “postmodern” in its many uses. Describe what you believe are three arguments supporting his view. Briefly put forward any alternative view that you might hold.


Session IX: Intellectuals, Power and Commitment, Identity, Authenticity, Multiculturalism
bell hooks. “A Revolution in Values: the Promise of Multicultural Change,” in Simon During, ed. The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 233- 240.

Cornel West. “The New Cultural Politics of Difference,” in Simon During, ed. The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 203-220.

Audre Lorde. 1984. “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House.” in Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press, pp.110-113. 


Session X: Intellectuals, Power and Commitment, Identity, Authenticity, Multiculturalism
John d’Emillio. “Capitalism and Gay Identity.” from Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. Ann Snitow, Christine Stansell & Sharan Thompson, eds. 1983. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Borges, Jorge Luis. “The Argentine Writer and Tradition” in Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Essays.

Stuart Hall. “What is this ‘Black’ in Black Popular Culture?” Social Justice, Vol. 20, nos 1-2. pp. 104-114.

In Our Time --- Borges (BBC Radio4 podcast)


Session XI: Cultural Studies in Societies of Control I
Kafka and the Crisis of the Society of Discipline

Franz Kafka. The Penal Colony.

Peruse and review:
The Dialectic of Enlightenment I: Bach, Kant, Theresiana, Frederick, Sade, Horkheimer

Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. “Juliette or Enlightenment and Morality” from Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, pp. 81-119.


Session XII: Cultural Studies in Societies of Control II
Kafka and the Crisis of the Society of Discipline

Franz Kafka. The Penal Colony.

Peruse and review:
The Dialectic of Enlightenment I: Bach, Kant, Theresiana, Frederick, Sade, Horkheimer

Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno. “Juliette or Enlightenment and Morality” from Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, pp. 81-119.


Session XIII: Cultural Studies in Societies of Control III
Herbert Marcuse. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Introduction and Chapter 1, http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/64onedim/odmcontents.html

Gilles Deleuze. “Postscript on the Societies of Control”


Comment IV. Due Sunday 7am.
Should an intellectual/ artist/writer etc. be social/y/politically committed in their work or should they stand at a distance from their commitments. Is the latter just another form of commitment?

Session XIV:
Herbert Marcuse. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Introduction and Chapter 1, http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/64onedim/odmcontents.html

Peruse and review:
Lefebvre, Henri. 1968. “Terror and Everyday Life” from Everyday Life in the Modern World. New York: Harper Torchbooks, pp.143-193. 
 
Ivan Zatz-Diaz. 2005. "The Weight of Nightmares: Small screens, social space and representation in contemporary capitalism" from Situations: Project of the Radical Imagination, Vol 1, No 1 (2005). http://ojs.gc.cuny.edu/index.php/situations/article/view/3


XIV. Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies
Raymond Williams. 1989. “The Future of Cultural Studies” in The Politics of Modernism. New York: Verso, pp. 151-162.

Stuart Hall. “Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies” in Simon During, ed. The Cultural Studies Reader. Second Edition. New York: Routledge, pp. 97-112.


Session XV: Review. Final Essay.
Comment V.
What do you see as the achievements and legacies of Cultural Studies? How do you respond to the question “What is the Future of Cultural Studies?”

____________________________________
Course Requirements and Grading

Short Essay Questions
There are five short essay questions. Each is directly related to the readings just completed. Short essays should be 2-4 pages (800-950 words).

While the quality of your weekly comments is most important, it is also important that all the work is performed as the semester progresses.

Self-Evaluation
At the end of the course you may submit a 1-2 page essay describing your evaluation of your performance and your assessment of what you believe to be a fair final grade.

Absences and Lateness
Persistent absences or lateness will result in a reduction of your final grade consistent with the policies of the university and of the department of Social Science & Cultural Studies.

An incomplete will be granted only in accordance with the established policy of the university. An incomplete is “available only if the student has been in regular attendance, has satisfied all but the final requirements of the course, and has furnished satisfactory proof that the work was not completed because of illness or other circumstances beyond control” (Pratt Institute Bulletin). If you do not turn in your final work on time, and you do not have an approved incomplete, you will fail the course.

Grades
80% - Short Essay Questions
10% - Class participation (e.g., being prepared for class, having the week’s reading in class, questioning the professor’s interpretation of the material, comments and questions about the course readings, etc)

_____________________
Readings
Required Text
ONE TEXT MUST BE PURCHASED:

Raymond Williams. 1989 (2007). The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists. New York: Verso. ISBN-10: 1-84467-580-7
ISBN-13: 978-1-84467-580-7

Most of the readings will be available through the LMS site for the course (at my.pratt.edu) or via the links provided in the syllabus. The exception is the required text by Raymond Williams.

*BRING YOUR OWN COPY OF THE READINGS TO CLASS EACH SESSION.*
*See Course and Grading requirements*

Suggested sources for purchasing the required text:
Book Culture (Broadway and 114th Street) http://www.bookculture.com/
St. Marks Bookshop http://www.stmarksbookshop.com
The Strand www.strandbooks.com (the huge second-hand store on 12th Street & Broadway).
The Advanced Book Exchange http://www.abebooks.com
Powell’s Books http://powells.com


Academic Integrity
Pratt Institute considers Academic Integrity highly important. Instances of cheating, plagiarism, and wrongful use of intellectual property will not be tolerated.
• Faculty members will report each incident to the registrar for inclusion in students’ files.
·More than one report to the registrar during a student’s program of study at Pratt will result in a hearing before the Academic Integrity Board, at which time appropriate sanctions will be decided. These may include dismissal from the Institute.
·The nature and severity of the infraction will be determined by faculty members who can: ask students to repeat an assignment, fail students on the assignment, fail students in the course and/or refer the incident to the Academic Integrity Board.

For more details about these procedures please see the Pratt Student Handbook, the Pratt Bulletins, and the pamphlet entitled Judicial Procedures at Pratt.

Cheating
If students use dishonest methods to fulfill course requirements, they are cheating. Examples of this include, but are not limited to:
• Obtaining or offering copies of exams or information about the content of exams in advance.
• Bringing notes in any form to a closed book exam.
• Looking at another student’s paper during an exam.
• Receiving or communicating any information from or to another student during an exam.

Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a bit more complicated, but the rules of documentation and citation are very specific and are tailored to different academic disciplines. Types of plagiarism include:
• Including any material from any source other than you in a paper or project without proper attribution. This includes material from the Internet, books, papers, or projects by other students, and from any other source.
• Using your own work to fulfill requirements for more than one course.
• The extensive use of the ideas of others in your work without proper attribution.
• Turning in work done by another person or a fellow student as one’s own.

Please remember that all work must be the student’s own. If it is not, the source should be cited and documented appropriately. If there are aspects of this statement that are not understood, ask faculty members for help.

“Community Standards”
Students must adhere to all Institute-wide policies listed in the Bulletin under “Community Standards” and which include policies on attendance, academic integrity, plagiarism, computer, and network use.

Accommodation of Disabilities
Not a problem, you should talk or write to me after one of the first classes. However, I am required to state that students who require special accommodations for disabilities must obtain clearance from the Office of Disability Services at the beginning of the semester. You should contact Mai McDonald, Disability Services Coordinator, in the Office of the Vice President for Student Affairs, Main Building, Lower Level: 718-636-3711.


*****

In addition to the readings for the course, it is highly recommended that you obtain these texts, especially if you are majoring in Critical & Visual Studies or completing the Minor in Cultural Studies:


Andrew Arato and Eike Gebhardt, eds. 1982. The Essential Frankfurt School Reader. New York: Continuum.

Stanley Aronowitz. 1993. Roll over Beethoven: The Return of Cultural Strife. Wesleyan University Press. ISBN: 0819562629.

Jorge Luis Borges. 1989. Ficciones. Anthony Kerrigan (Editor), Anthony Bonner (Translator). Grove Press; ISBN: 0802130305. 
 

Simon During, ed. 1999. The Cultural Studies Reader. 2nd edition. Routledge; ISBN: 0415137543.

Murray Edelman. 1998. Constructing the Political Spectacle. University Of Chicago Press. ISBN-10: 0226183998.

Michel Foucault. 1973. The Order of Things: A History of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage. ASIN: B000HZIHD0.

Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno edited by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, translated by Edmund Jephcott. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford University Press. ISBN: 0804736332. DO NOT ORDER THE OLDER TRANSLATION PUBLISHED BY CONTINUUM EXCEPT FOR REFERENCE.

Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, eds. 1988. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. University of Illinois Press. ISBN-10: 0252014014; ISBN-13: 978-0252014017.

John Storey, ed. 1997. What is Cultural Studies? A Reader. New York: Arnold/St. Martin's Press. 1997. ISBN-10: 0340652403; ISBN-13: 978-0340652404.

John Storey. 2003. Cultural Studies and the Study of Popular Culture: Theories and Methods.
University of Georgia Press, Second edition. ISBN-10: 082032566X; ISBN-13: 978-0820325668.

Raymond Williams. Materialism and Culture. New York: Verso. ISBN-10: 1844670600
ISBN-13: 978-1844670604.

Raymond Williams. (1976) 1985. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Revised edition. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN-10: 0195204697; ISBN-13: 978-0195204698.
__________________

Documentaries, Films, and Music which will be referred to during the Course

Stuart Hall Representation and the Media (lecture)
Debate between Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault on Human Nature (video)
bell hooks Cultural Criticism & Transformation (interview/discussion)
Casablanca
The Trial (Orson Wells version)
Metropolis
Brazil
Dr. Strangelove
Degenerate Art Exhibit documentary.
Michael Wood Hitler’s Search for the Holy Grail documentary.
Marcuse's Hippopotamus documentary.
Committee for a Free Congress History of Political Correctness documentary.
The Train

Arnold Schoenberg
Pierrot lunaire
Alban Berg
Violin Concerto
Anton Webern conducts Alban Berg's Violin Concerto ("To the Memory of an Angel"), with Louis Krasner, who commissioned the work as a tribute to Manon Gropius, the recently deceased daughter of Alma Mahler and Walter Gropius.
or
Theodor Adorno
String Quartets
    Sechs kurze Orchesterstücke, VI
Anton Webern
Five Movements for String Quartet
Variations for Piano (performed by Glenn Gould)
Quartet for violin, clarinet, tenor sax and piano
Arr. of Bach's Musical Offering
Video of a performance:
John Cage
Music for Marcel Duchamp
As Slow as Possible
Music for Piano
Charles Ives
Songs
Conlon Nancarrow
Studies for Player Piano
Steve Reich
Octet
Six Marimbas
New York Counter Point
Music for 18 Musicians
Dagmar Krause
Songs of Kurt Weill (see also her Tank Battles: Songs of Hans Eisler)
Deutsche Miserere
Zu Potsdam "Unter den Eichen"
In Potsdam "Unter den Eichen"
Carla Bley
Musique Machanique
Sidney Bechet
High Society
Louis Armstrong & King Oliver
Canal Street Blues
Dizzy Gillespie & Charlie Parker
Bebop
The Ornette Coleman Double Quartet
Free Jazz
John Coltrane
A Love Supreme
Thelonious Monk & John Coltrane
Off Minor
Fred Frith
Prints
Legs (from the documentary Step Across the Border)
Robert Fripp
Frippertronics Improvisation
Robert Fripp String Quintet Live
League of Gentlemen - Dislocated
Astor Piazzolla musical settings of some poems of Jorge Luis Borges
Rough Dancer and the Cyclical Night
El Tango
see also Borges & Piazzolla